06/26/2018 by Caleb Gedemer
The vacuum effect is a phenomenon scientifically recognized worldwide, across all types of animal species. Well-known among biologists, the vacuum effect describes what happens when even some of an animal population is permanently removed from its home range. This applies to the Pokemon Trading Card Game, when a deck “disappears” from the metagame: everything changes. This has been happening back and forth in our Standard format, leading to some very confusing, but interesting shifts.
Table of contents
BREAKthrough through Forbidden Light Standard Format History
Most players attending “week one” events had just come off a stale Standard format that had been played for many different Regionals, including the most recent Canadian Regional event the week before. For this reason, I think there was a lot of mixed views on the format itself. Buzzwole hardliners stuck with the deck but played relatively undeveloped lists and had certainly not come upon the “optimal” sixty cards. Malamar (FLI; 51) also had been hyped to counter the Buzzwole decks, but Zoroark GX (SLG; 53) was there to counter the Malamar decks in return. This lead to a bit of a messy transition to the format, and even yours truly playing Turbo Lapras GX (SUM; 139) …
Week One: Figuring Things Out with Malamar and Random Zoroark-GX in Europe
- France: Rough Metagame Accuracy of 50%
- Mexico: Rough Metagame Accuracy of 90%
- Russia: Rough Metagame Accuracy of 5%
- South Africa: Rough Metagame Accuracy of 5%
The National Championship events are anomalies, as they took place in less-competitive countries that don’t have as easy of access to all of the cards. The Mexican event’s meta was starkly concentrated with Buzzwole decks, and I even played three myself. Malamar (FLI; 51) was around, too, especially with Ultra Necrozma GX (FLI; 95) (shortly dismissed as the “worse” version of the deck, however). The French Special Event was weird, though, with Zoroark GX (SLG; 53) winning the event and seemingly avoiding, or somehow beating, all of the Buzzwole decks that made up day two. Malamar (FLI; 51) is easy pickings for Zoroark-GX, so coming across those frequently, as it did, helped it out in the process to winning the whole event. Coming off of this event, Malamar was shown as a serious threat to Buzzwole, and Zoroark-GX started to cast a shadow over the format, daring Malamar players to play their deck.
Weekly Winner: Malamar
Week Two: Zoroark-GX is Back, Malamar Still Up There
Malamar (FLI; 51) became highly concentrated in the next Mexican Specials, but Zoroark GX (SLG; 53) was there to rear its head and beat it. Buzzwole shrunk in popularity and was also punished by the high frequency of Malamar decks. The Melbourne Regionals was extremely weird, showing off a variety of strange decks, and a unique Greninja BREAK list even winning the event. I don’t think this event was an accurate representation of the metagame, whereas the Mexican event was closer to actuality.
Weekly Winner: Zoroark-GX
Week Three: Buzzwole Dominance
- Chile: Rough Metagame Accuracy of 50%
- Malaysia: Rough Metagame Accuracy of 75%
- Wisconsin: Rough Metagame Accuracy of 95%
Buzzwole found its groove this week with its best list. Three baby Buzzwole was much too much for the Zoroark GX (SLG; 53) decks on the rise from the week before. Not only that, but the Pokemon-EX/GX-heavy Malamar decks did very poorly against the “broken” Buzzwole deck as well. All of this considered, Buzzwole dominated Wisconsin Regionals and did well elsewhere, too. While it wasn’t as common as it was in Wisconsin, that was more because less foreign players, if any, had access to the “new” list for Buzzwole with the three babies.
Weekly Winner: Buzzwole
Week Four: Crazy Stuff, Buzzwole Hanging Around, Greninja BREAK Resurgence
- Singapore: Rough Metagame Accuracy of 50%
I don’t want to say this week “doesn’t count”, but the Singapore event was much smaller and less concentrated with the game’s best players, giving it a little less accurate of a read into the state of the metagame. Obviously, many adaptations carried over from the previous weeks, but this event was overall a very strange mix of successful decks, with Zoroark GX (SLG; 53) / Lucario GX (BW; 100) winning the whole thing. I don’t think this week had a clear winner, but it was a bit of a foresight into the coming week as far as Zoroark-GX decks making an even bigger resurgence goes.
Weekly Winner: Not Applicable
Week Five: Zoroark-GX Takes Malamar Down Again
- England: Rough Metagame Accuracy of 95%
- Hong Kong: Rough Metagame Accuracy of 25%
- Mexico: Rough Metagame Accuracy of 90%
This week is extremely interesting, as the week one and two developments seemingly all took place within the same week; everything was meshed into one metagame-developing series of events. Malamar (FLI; 51) was played in high numbers to counter Buzzwole at these events and in turn, Zoroark GX (SLG; 53) dominated and won both of them! I even lost in the finals of the Mexican Special Championship to a Zoroark-GX / Golisopod GX (BUS; 129) deck, adding even more truth to this sentiment. I think the coming weeks will switch back to beating Zoroark-GX, or finding a happy medium between everything, which seems extremely difficult starting off. On with the vicious vacuum effect cycle we go, which deck will disappear next?
Weekly Winner: Zoroark-GX
It’s time to spice things up, this rock-paper-scissors of a format we’ve found ourselves in needs some new diversity. What can we do about it? It’s time to go over some creative ways to address, well, everything!
The rest of the article is only available to 60cards.net PRO Members. Sign up for PRO Member today to view the rest of the article!
In order to maintain a high standard for our content, we have created a subscription service. To get you the best possible articles from the top players we pay more than $25 000 every year to our authors and editors. There are endless hours of playtesting and research behind each article. Our goal is to be able to publish an article every day and make even more competitions for everyone. Thank you for considering our subscription.
More information here.
Thank you for your time. Please leave us your feedback to help us to improve the articles for you!
Pokémon and its trademarks are ©1995-2018 Nintendo, Creatures, and GAMEFREAK. English card images appearing on this website are the property of The Pokémon Company International, Inc. 60cards is a fan site. Our goal is to promote the Pokemon TCG and help it grow. We are not official in any shape or form, nor affiliated, sponsored, or otherwise endorsed by Nintendo, Creatures, GAMEFREAK, or TPCi.